IM • Mail • POKE • Twitter • RSS

hi! i’m Tom, founder and creative director of POKE.  i live in CT, work in NYC, munch on tasty digital cookies, collect lunchboxes, take lots of photos and buy lots of t-shirts.  mmm…cookies. i’m passionate about creating a safe internet for kids, cookies, really great Italian cooking, all kinds of dogs, digital photography and the power of technology and how it affects our daily lives. i’d love to tell you i read a lot - but i just don’t. so there. Psychotic.

« The future of social media —Part 2 | Main | an acid trip of an experiment »

What is the future of Social Media?

The following is a response to a posting I found today:

my response:

2008 is the beginning of the “Curation” process. There is a quality revolution taking place in social media - video’s, blogs, photos, microblogs, etc will get more specific and more focused. Content will be much more focused on “how good it is” not on “how many people have seen it”.

excerpt from the posting:

Looking back at Social Media, we have had a significant advance (a ‘this year’s big thing’) every year since 2004.

In 2004
- blogs started to really take off
In 2005
- audio podcasts started to take off
In 2006
- video podcasts started to take off
In 2007
- microblogging (Twitter, etc) started to take off
In 2008
- ???

We are in November now of 2008 and I still don’t see any big transformative Social Media technology which has occurred this year.

Has it stalled? What am I missing?

What do you think?

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (6)

Social Symbiosis. The previous tools changing and updating based on the reactions of others.
November 6, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterLen Kendall
In looking for a "stall" the author misunderstands statistics. Nothing happens evenly. There is nothing magical about the length of a calendar year. It's just a human convention. As Bertrand Russell said, in the greatest depths of interstellar space, there are still three feet to a yard (from the introduction to Why I Am Not a Christian I think).

No new transformative technologies this year doesn't mean a stall, and we could have three in January 09 and it would not imply an acceleration.

Apart from that, my own guess is in line with curation; I think editors will resurge. In a way we need them more than ever to help us efficiently weed through both the junk and the stuff we aren't interested in. I think we will start to see more of them, to value them (with $), and to choose the ones we like.

An interesting question is whether editors (I'm using the term loosely) will start to do more fact checking as they always have in trad media. Fact checking has often been absent from internet communication, which in many cases resembles talk radio in providing a seemingly legitimizing forum for people to promote things that simply aren't true. Whether malicious or not, disinformation is not helpful.

We like to evaluate what we hear and read with our intuition. Does it "feel" true? Since many things that "feel" true aren't true at all, it's a terrible way to determine truth. The internet, regrettably, has reinforced the idea that intuition is a viable way to evaluate statements of all kinds, so a bit of a sea change will be needed. Perhaps a resurgence of editors can contribute?
November 6, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterJames Bradley
Not sure if this is what you are looking for, but @kevinmhuff just referred me to www.Flock.com. It's a browser (built on the FF platform), that is designed completely around Social Networking. If it catches on, it could completely redefine how we browse on the Internet. Needs a few minor tweaks (from what I can see), but so far looks pretty cool.
November 6, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterKevin Mogee
In 2008, the general (non-nerd) public is getting their first taste of semantic web awesomeness. My phone knows where I am, and can find things close to my current location. This was possible before before, but it's getting faster, smarter, and even Soccer Moms can do it. Also, people are filtering out the once novel and interesting looking Web2.0 sites, in the same way that they filter out crappy television. "Flashier" is losing to "Smarter" and "More Integrated". Pinning a specific label on "2008" is tough; things are just getting smarter.

Quasi related: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_maps#Development_history
November 6, 2008 | Unregistered Commentercharles
Awesome topic! Put a response up on BrandsAmongMany here: http://www.brandsamongmany.com/2008/11/06/2008-social-media-claim-to-fame/
November 6, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDanny
Mobile devices providing apps like facebook & twitter coupled with texting and photo sharing are all contributing to this "Social Symbiosis" (well put Len)

Email, computers, hard drives, disks are all dying (Mac Air no drive?)

Facebook, iPhones and Clouds are thriving. (think me.com)

USB drives will be the 8 track of the 2000's
November 6, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterpaul

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.